You are here

Evaluation criteria

To be evaluated, both abstract and full text must meet the requirement of adequacy standards (font type, length).

The CIEVES 2014 Scientific Committee will evaluate abstract and full text based on the following criteria:

  • Appropriateness to the Conference main theme (training and experiences in assessment)

  • The communication’s conceptual, theoretical, or experiential contributions to the field of assessment studies

  • Connection to the chosen core theme

  • Relevance and impact

  • Clarity and adequacy of the information provided

  • Coherence and reasoning of the proposal


Following analysis of the communication contents, the Scientific Committee may suggest the inclusion of the submission in a different core theme.